ConradJohnsonSecondPaper 6 - 11 Apr 2013 - Main.ConradJohnson
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondPaper" |
| |
< < | ConnectNYC: Mayor Bloomberg's Attempt at Solving the Digital Divide [Second Draft] | > > | ConnectNYC: Mayor Bloomberg's Attempt at Solving the Digital Divide | | | |
< < | -- By ConradJohnson - 31 March 2013 | > > | -- By ConradJohnson - 8 April 2013 - Final Revisions | | | | It would be unfair to state that nothing positive could stem from an initiative like ConnectNYC. The mere fact that this initiative was created demonstrates a crucial awareness by Mayor Bloomberg of the importance of accessible internet for the City’s population. In the digital economy, it is of great importance that our politicians recognize that removing impediments to internet access will allow the skilled minds in poorer neighborhoods to participate in higher-value activities without relocating, thus directly producing better lives in their community. ConnectNYC could achieve this goal by removing the cost of fiber build-out for smaller businesses. The cost of a wiring build-out is often identified as one of the biggest hurdles to getting businesses connected to broadband internet, with the average cost being approximately $50,000 per business. Thus, ConnectNYC could harness market dynamics and alleviate this financial and technological burden for numerous businesses in underprivileged neighborhoods. | |
< < | Failure's to Adress the Digital Divide | > > | Failures to Address the Digital Divide | | Although eliminating this cost could be very beneficial for a few small businesses, one of the requirements for achieving the true benefits of a digital economy by reducing the “digital divide” is to provide unimpeded access to the network, regardless of ability to pay. Yet, for ConnectNYC, free isn’t free, and the ability to pay may still be a factor. Once selections have been made, businesses chosen to participate will be required to sign a one-year service contract with a participating Internet Service Provider (Time Warner Cable and Cablevision) at negotiated market rates prior to being eligible to receive the fiber build-out. This service contract would thus maintain impediments towards access to information and communication technologies that would continue to be felt by those in low-income communities. | | The inefficiencies of ConnectNYC reflect more systemic issues facing the U.S. as a whole. As in NYC, most high-speed wired internet access to homes and businesses is provided by a small number of for-profit cable companies that have very little local competition and almost no checks on their pricing. Though there are several large cable companies nationwide, each dominates its own fragmented kingdom of local markets (e.g. Comcast in Philadelphia, Time Warner in Cleveland). This lack of competition from other cable companies or alternate delivery technologies allows each of the major cable distributors to raise prices in its region for high-speed Internet services while failing to improve their systems. Further, it provides little incentives to expand into rural or underprivileged areas where potential customers are relatively few and far between. | |
< < | Compounding the problem is the deregulation of high-speed internet access that has both failed to increase competition and has removed hope of government oversight to protect the public. Thus, Americans face higher prices for less access to slower broadband internet than citizens in many countries around world. By contrast, governments that have intervened in high-speed Internet markets have seen higher numbers of people adopting technology and at lower subscription charges. For example, consumers in Seoul, Paris, and Amsterdam pay only $35-$45 for speeds that are much faster than those for which Americans pay $100-$150 per month. 2012 data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development shows that people in the U.S. pay at least $1.10 per Mbps, where people in South Korea pay $.21 per Mbps. | > > | Compounding the problem is the deregulation of high-speed internet access that has both failed to increase competition and has removed hope of government oversight to protect the public. Thus, Americans face higher prices for less access to slower broadband internet than citizens in many countries around world. By contrast, governments that have intervened in high-speed Internet markets have seen higher numbers of people adopting technology and at lower subscription charges. For example, consumers in Seoul, Paris, and Amsterdam pay only $35-$45 for speeds that are much faster than those for which Americans pay $100-$150 per month. 2012 data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development shows that people in the U.S. pay at least $1.10 per Mbps, where people in South Korea pay $.21 per Mbps. | | Conclusion |
|
ConradJohnsonSecondPaper 4 - 31 Mar 2013 - Main.ConradJohnson
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondPaper" |
ConnectNYC: Mayor Bloomberg's Attempt at Solving the Digital Divide
-- By ConradJohnson - 31 March 2013 | |
> > | | | Introduction: ConnectNYC | |
< < | On October 19, 2012, New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg launched ConnectNYC, a competition to install free fiber cable wiring in growing businesses across the City’s five boroughs. The purpose of this competition is to encourage small and medium-sized businesses in unwired or under-wired buildings to apply for free fast-track wiring that would ultimately provide or improve access to high-speed broadband internet. Companies would apply through a competitive process that will make awards based on a demonstration of how additional connectivity would help them grow their business. Ultimately, by the end of the second year of the program, the City expects Time Warner Cable and Cablevision (partners in the initiative) to commence free fiber build-out for 240 competition-winning businesses. | > > | On October 19, 2012, New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg launched ConnectNYC, a competition to install free fiber cable wiring in growing businesses across the City's five boroughs. The purpose of this competition is to encourage small and medium-sized businesses in unwired or under-wired buildings to apply for free fast-track wiring that would provide or improve access to high-speed broadband internet. Companies would apply through a competitive process that will make awards based on a demonstration of how additional connectivity would help them grow their business. Ultimately, by the end of the second year of the program, the City expects Time Warner Cable and Cablevision (partners in the initiative) to commence free fiber build-out for 240 competition-winning businesses. | | | |
< < | ConnectNYC is part of a larger set of new initiatives planned by Mayor Bloomberg “designed to address specific challenge areas the City faces to ensure NYC is a global leader in connectivity and technology in the 21st century” (description of other iniatives. When taken as a whole, Mayor Bloomberg’s new initiatives appear to be designed to capitalize on the growth currently taking place within the City’s technology sector. The Mayor stated so himself, noting his intent on supporting the “growing technology industry” that “is diversifying the City’s economy and creating the jobs of the future.” “To support those jobs,” said the Mayor, “we need to help the industry get the resources it needs – whether that means more qualified engineers or broadband connections.” Thus, as part of his tireless pursuit to make NYC rival Silicon Valley as the center for technological work and innovation, Mayor Bloomberg recognizes the benefits of supporting technological growth in a variety of sectors. Yet, the Mayor insists that these initiatives, particularly ConnectNYC, are truly geared toward decreasing the “digital divide” – the inequality between groups, broadly construed, in terms of access to information and communication technologies – in the City. The Mayor believes tt can achieve this because “it will make sure more businesses and more New Yorkers can get connected.” However, despite the Mayor’s assertions and any potential benefits of the program, ConnectNYC fails to truly serve the underserved in pursuit of increased digital connectivity. | > > | ConnectNYC is part of a larger set of new initiatives planned by Mayor Bloomberg “designed to address specific challenge areas the City faces to ensure NYC is a global leader in connectivity and technology in the 21st century." When taken as a whole, the Mayor insists that these initiatives, are truly geared toward decreasing the “digital divide” – the inequality between groups, broadly construed, in terms of access to information and communication technologies – in the City. The Mayor believes ConnectNYC can help alleviate the problem because “it will make sure more businesses and more New Yorkers can get connected.” However, despite the Mayor’s assertions and any nominal benefit gained, ConnectNYC fails to truly serve the “underprivileged” in the pursuit of increased digital connectivity. Rather, ConnectNYC may function more as smokescreen, masking the depth and severity of the digital divide that Americans face. | | Benefits | |
< < | It would be unfair to state that nothing positive could stem from an initiative like ConnectNYC. In fact, that notion would be entirely incorrect. The mere fact that this initiative was created demonstrates a crucial awareness by Mayor Bloomberg and other politicians of the importance of accessible internet for the City’s population. As City Council Speaker Christine C. Quinn noted, this effort to “improve access to high-speed broadband come[s] at a time when our city’s businesses and residents depend on the internet more now than ever before.” What these politicians are realizing is that internet access, particularly broadband in NYC, is the infrastructure of the modern age and a basic necessity, not just for tech businesses, but for every business. Thus, ConnectNYC could harness market dynamics and incentives for the private sector to expand New York’s broadband infrastructure.
Furthermore, in the digital economy, it is of great importance that our politicians recognize that removing impediments to internet access will allow the skilled minds produced in poorer places in the city to participate in higher-value activities without relocating, thus directly producing better lives for their community. ConnectNYC could achieve this goal by removing the cost of fiber build-out for smaller businesses in underserved communities. The cost of a wiring build-out is often identified as one of the biggest hurdles to getting businesses connected to broadband internet, with the average cost being approximately $50,000 per business. However, although eliminating this cost could be very beneficial for some small businesses, one of the requirements for achieving the true benefits of a digital economy by reducing the “digital divide” is to provide unimpeded access to the network, regardless of ability to pay. | > > | It would be unfair to state that nothing positive could stem from an initiative like ConnectNYC. The mere fact that this initiative was created demonstrates a crucial awareness by Mayor Bloomberg of the importance of accessible internet for the City’s population. In the digital economy, it is of great importance that our politicians recognize that removing impediments to internet access will allow the skilled minds in poorer neighborhoods to participate in higher-value activities without relocating, thus directly producing better lives in their community. ConnectNYC could achieve this goal by removing the cost of fiber build-out for smaller businesses. The cost of a wiring build-out is often identified as one of the biggest hurdles to getting businesses connected to broadband internet, with the average cost being approximately $50,000 per business. Thus, ConnectNYC could harness market dynamics and alleviate this financial and technological burden for numerous businesses in underprivileged neighborhoods. | | Failure's to Adress the Digital Divide | |
< < | For ConnectNYC, free isn’t free, and the ability to pay may still be a factor. Once selections have been made, businesses chosen to participate will be required to sign a one-year service contract with a participating Internet Service Provider (Time Warner Cable and Cablevision) at negotiated market rates prior to being eligible to receive the fiber build-out. This service contract would thus maintain impediments towards access to information and communication technologies that would continue to be felt by those in low-income communities. | > > | Although eliminating this cost could be very beneficial for a few small businesses, one of the requirements for achieving the true benefits of a digital economy by reducing the “digital divide” is to provide unimpeded access to the network, regardless of ability to pay. Yet, for ConnectNYC, free isn’t free, and the ability to pay may still be a factor. Once selections have been made, businesses chosen to participate will be required to sign a one-year service contract with a participating Internet Service Provider (Time Warner Cable and Cablevision) at negotiated market rates prior to being eligible to receive the fiber build-out. This service contract would thus maintain impediments towards access to information and communication technologies that would continue to be felt by those in low-income communities. | | | |
< < | A purported justification for this service fee is that the two year program will equal $12 million, with presumably most of the costs for the build-outs falling on the ISPs. Yet, one can only assume that the ISP’s efforts to expand the broadband infrastructure into other areas of the City were inevitable, given that it would make proper business sense to extend their services into new developing communities. ConnectNYC simply ensures that the ISP’s consumer base grows. Furthermore, this argument fails to recognize that ConnectNYC provides that the ISPs have final say on whom the awards are given to. Although the City will create a list of finalists by considering factors such as the potential to improve broadband infrastructure in underserved areas, the ISP’s final determination will be based on the feasibility of wiring the finalist’s location. As a result, this will continue to prevent broadband internet accessibility in certain communities. | > > | A purported justification for this service fee is that the two year program will equal $12 million, with presumably most of the costs for the build-outs falling on the ISPs. Yet, this argument fails to recognize that ConnectNYC provides that the ISPs have final say on whom the awards are given to. Although the City will create a list of finalists by considering several factors, the ISP’s final determination will be based on the feasibility of wiring the finalist’s location. As a result, this will continue to prevent broadband internet accessibility in certain communities. | | | |
< < | Similarly, the City (through ConnectNYC) has only assured that a minimum of 25% of the overall award value will be granted to businesses located in Industrial Business Zones. This could potentially mean that only a small number of the award winners come from the most underserved areas, again failing to live up to it’s alleged purpose of decreasing the digital divide in the City. | > > | Similarly, the City has only assured that a minimum of 25% of the overall award value will be granted to businesses located in Industrial Business Zones. This could potentially mean that only a small number of the award winners come from the most underserved areas. Further, the small number of businesses impacted pales in comparison to the millions of civilians without access. Thus, ConnectNYC serves mostly as busy work, lulling New Yorkers into believing that true access is being provided. | | | |
< < | Conclusion | > > | Systemic Issues | | | |
< < | Ultimately, although ConnectNYC provides wiring and reduces the number of “digital deserts” in the City, it still presents impediments to real access to networks. As such, it also fails to realize its maximum economic potential. The ultimate determination as to whether the digital divide is being addressed will come when the City reveals the award winners on March 1, 2013. | > > | The inefficiencies of ConnectNYC reflect more systemic issues facing the U.S. as a whole. As in NYC, most high-speed wired internet access to homes and businesses is provided by a small number of for-profit cable companies that have very little local competition and almost no checks on their pricing. Though there are several large cable companies nationwide, each dominates its own fragmented kingdom of local markets (e.g. Comcast in Philadelphia, Time Warner in Cleveland). This lack of competition from other cable companies or alternate delivery technologies allows each of the major cable distributors to raise prices in its region for high-speed Internet services while failing to improve their systems. Further, it provides little incentives to expand into rural or underprivileged areas where potential customers are relatively few and far between. | | | |
> > | Compounding the problem is the deregulation of high-speed internet access that has both failed to increase competition and has removed hope of government oversight to protect the public. Thus, Americans face higher prices for less access to slower broadband internet than citizens in many countries around world. By contrast, governments that have intervened in high-speed Internet markets have seen higher numbers of people adopting technology and at lower subscription charges. For example, consumers in Seoul, Paris, and Amsterdam pay only $35-$45 for speeds that are much faster than those for which Americans pay $100-$150 per month. 2012 data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development shows that people in the U.S. pay at least $1.10 per Mbps, where people in South Korea pay $.21 per Mbps. | | | |
< < | It seems to me that the
primary difficulty here lies in taking all of this at anywhere near
face value. What we have is a small subsidy ($12m over two years:
chicken feed on both sides) to the cable thugs to go out and make
some television commercials for themselves with squeaky clean young
businesses while getting around to a few buildings they haven't
bothered with, because they're just marginally not good enough to
bother about. But if the city will pay them $12m to get around to
them.....
This isn't bandwidth policy. This is a little tip that was thrown
around like small change when some other deals were being done. TW
Cable and Cablevision have more than that in back taxes they haven't
paid, I daresay. We can solemnly discuss whether it's good or bad
but the truth is it's just hype. The actual issues of how to
connect communities in are $100s millions wide in NYC, $10s billions wide
across the US, and they don't have to do with fiber-to-business.
They have to do with giving everybody, across the continent,
realistic broadband at affordable prices, which the US network
operators don't want to do. Nothing the size of this little program
has anything to do with that, and what your essay might want to be
about is the way in which little stuff on this scale looks busy, and
keeps Americans from demanding what other people in the world
already have.
| > > | Conclusion | | | |
> > | Ultimately, although ConnectNYC provides wiring and reduces the number of “digital deserts” in the City, it still presents impediments to real access to networks. As such, it also fails to realize its maximum economic potential. In so doing, it hides the fact that these “generous” ISP’s are the ones holding them back. | | |
|
ConradJohnsonSecondPaper 2 - 28 Jan 2013 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondPaper" |
| |
< < | ConnectNYC? : Mayor Bloomberg's Attempt at Solving the Digital Divide | > > | ConnectNYC: Mayor Bloomberg's Attempt at Solving the Digital Divide | | -- By ConradJohnson - 02 Dec 2012 | |
< < | Introduction: ConnectNYC? | > > | Introduction: ConnectNYC | | | |
< < | On October 19, 2012, New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg launched ConnectNYC? , a competition to install free fiber cable wiring in growing businesses across the City’s five boroughs. The purpose of this competition is to encourage small and medium-sized businesses in unwired or under-wired buildings to apply for free fast-track wiring that would ultimately provide or improve access to high-speed broadband internet. Companies would apply through a competitive process that will make awards based on a demonstration of how additional connectivity would help them grow their business. Ultimately, by the end of the second year of the program, the City expects Time Warner Cable and Cablevision (partners in the initiative) to commence free fiber build-out for 240 competition-winning businesses. | > > | On October 19, 2012, New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg launched ConnectNYC, a competition to install free fiber cable wiring in growing businesses across the City’s five boroughs. The purpose of this competition is to encourage small and medium-sized businesses in unwired or under-wired buildings to apply for free fast-track wiring that would ultimately provide or improve access to high-speed broadband internet. Companies would apply through a competitive process that will make awards based on a demonstration of how additional connectivity would help them grow their business. Ultimately, by the end of the second year of the program, the City expects Time Warner Cable and Cablevision (partners in the initiative) to commence free fiber build-out for 240 competition-winning businesses. | | | |
< < | ConnectNYC? is part of a larger set of new initiatives planned by Mayor Bloomberg “designed to address specific challenge areas the City faces to ensure NYC is a global leader in connectivity and technology in the 21st century” (description of other iniatives. When taken as a whole, Mayor Bloomberg’s new initiatives appear to be designed to capitalize on the growth currently taking place within the City’s technology sector. The Mayor stated so himself, noting his intent on supporting the “growing technology industry” that “is diversifying the City’s economy and creating the jobs of the future.” “To support those jobs,” said the Mayor, “we need to help the industry get the resources it needs – whether that means more qualified engineers or broadband connections.” Thus, as part of his tireless pursuit to make NYC rival Silicon Valley as the center for technological work and innovation, Mayor Bloomberg recognizes the benefits of supporting technological growth in a variety of sectors. Yet, the Mayor insists that these initiatives, particularly ConnectNYC? , are truly geared toward decreasing the “digital divide” – the inequality between groups, broadly construed, in terms of access to information and communication technologies – in the City. The Mayor believes tt can achieve this because “it will make sure more businesses and more New Yorkers can get connected.” However, despite the Mayor’s assertions and any potential benefits of the program, ConnectNYC? fails to truly serve the underserved in pursuit of increased digital connectivity. | > > | ConnectNYC is part of a larger set of new initiatives planned by Mayor Bloomberg “designed to address specific challenge areas the City faces to ensure NYC is a global leader in connectivity and technology in the 21st century” (description of other iniatives. When taken as a whole, Mayor Bloomberg’s new initiatives appear to be designed to capitalize on the growth currently taking place within the City’s technology sector. The Mayor stated so himself, noting his intent on supporting the “growing technology industry” that “is diversifying the City’s economy and creating the jobs of the future.” “To support those jobs,” said the Mayor, “we need to help the industry get the resources it needs – whether that means more qualified engineers or broadband connections.” Thus, as part of his tireless pursuit to make NYC rival Silicon Valley as the center for technological work and innovation, Mayor Bloomberg recognizes the benefits of supporting technological growth in a variety of sectors. Yet, the Mayor insists that these initiatives, particularly ConnectNYC, are truly geared toward decreasing the “digital divide” – the inequality between groups, broadly construed, in terms of access to information and communication technologies – in the City. The Mayor believes tt can achieve this because “it will make sure more businesses and more New Yorkers can get connected.” However, despite the Mayor’s assertions and any potential benefits of the program, ConnectNYC fails to truly serve the underserved in pursuit of increased digital connectivity. | | Benefits | |
< < | It would be unfair to state that nothing positive could stem from an initiative like ConnectNYC? . In fact, that notion would be entirely incorrect. The mere fact that this initiative was created demonstrates a crucial awareness by Mayor Bloomberg and other politicians of the importance of accessible internet for the City’s population. As City Council Speaker Christine C. Quinn noted, this effort to “improve access to high-speed broadband come[s] at a time when our city’s businesses and residents depend on the internet more now than ever before.” What these politicians are realizing is that internet access, particularly broadband in NYC, is the infrastructure of the modern age and a basic necessity, not just for tech businesses, but for every business. Thus, ConnectNYC? could harness market dynamics and incentives for the private sector to expand New York’s broadband infrastructure. | > > | It would be unfair to state that nothing positive could stem from an initiative like ConnectNYC. In fact, that notion would be entirely incorrect. The mere fact that this initiative was created demonstrates a crucial awareness by Mayor Bloomberg and other politicians of the importance of accessible internet for the City’s population. As City Council Speaker Christine C. Quinn noted, this effort to “improve access to high-speed broadband come[s] at a time when our city’s businesses and residents depend on the internet more now than ever before.” What these politicians are realizing is that internet access, particularly broadband in NYC, is the infrastructure of the modern age and a basic necessity, not just for tech businesses, but for every business. Thus, ConnectNYC could harness market dynamics and incentives for the private sector to expand New York’s broadband infrastructure. | | | |
< < | Furthermore, in the digital economy, it is of great importance that our politicians recognize that removing impediments to internet access will allow the skilled minds produced in poorer places in the city to participate in higher-value activities without relocating, thus directly producing better lives for their community. ConnectNYC? could achieve this goal by removing the cost of fiber build-out for smaller businesses in underserved communities. The cost of a wiring build-out is often identified as one of the biggest hurdles to getting businesses connected to broadband internet, with the average cost being approximately $50,000 per business. However, although eliminating this cost could be very beneficial for some small businesses, one of the requirements for achieving the true benefits of a digital economy by reducing the “digital divide” is to provide unimpeded access to the network, regardless of ability to pay. | > > | Furthermore, in the digital economy, it is of great importance that our politicians recognize that removing impediments to internet access will allow the skilled minds produced in poorer places in the city to participate in higher-value activities without relocating, thus directly producing better lives for their community. ConnectNYC could achieve this goal by removing the cost of fiber build-out for smaller businesses in underserved communities. The cost of a wiring build-out is often identified as one of the biggest hurdles to getting businesses connected to broadband internet, with the average cost being approximately $50,000 per business. However, although eliminating this cost could be very beneficial for some small businesses, one of the requirements for achieving the true benefits of a digital economy by reducing the “digital divide” is to provide unimpeded access to the network, regardless of ability to pay. | | Failure's to Adress the Digital Divide | |
< < | For ConnectNYC? , free isn’t free, and the ability to pay may still be a factor. Once selections have been made, businesses chosen to participate will be required to sign a one-year service contract with a participating Internet Service Provider (Time Warner Cable and Cablevision) at negotiated market rates prior to being eligible to receive the fiber build-out. This service contract would thus maintain impediments towards access to information and communication technologies that would continue to be felt by those in low-income communities. | > > | For ConnectNYC, free isn’t free, and the ability to pay may still be a factor. Once selections have been made, businesses chosen to participate will be required to sign a one-year service contract with a participating Internet Service Provider (Time Warner Cable and Cablevision) at negotiated market rates prior to being eligible to receive the fiber build-out. This service contract would thus maintain impediments towards access to information and communication technologies that would continue to be felt by those in low-income communities. | | | |
< < | A purported justification for this service fee is that the two year program will equal $12 million, with presumably most of the costs for the build-outs falling on the ISPs. Yet, one can only assume that the ISP’s efforts to expand the broadband infrastructure into other areas of the City were inevitable, given that it would make proper business sense to extend their services into new developing communities. ConnectNYC? simply ensures that the ISP’s consumer base grows. Furthermore, this argument fails to recognize that ConnectNYC? provides that the ISPs have final say on whom the awards are given to. Although the City will create a list of finalists by considering factors such as the potential to improve broadband infrastructure in underserved areas, the ISP’s final determination will be based on the feasibility of wiring the finalist’s location. As a result, this will continue to prevent broadband internet accessibility in certain communities. | > > | A purported justification for this service fee is that the two year program will equal $12 million, with presumably most of the costs for the build-outs falling on the ISPs. Yet, one can only assume that the ISP’s efforts to expand the broadband infrastructure into other areas of the City were inevitable, given that it would make proper business sense to extend their services into new developing communities. ConnectNYC simply ensures that the ISP’s consumer base grows. Furthermore, this argument fails to recognize that ConnectNYC provides that the ISPs have final say on whom the awards are given to. Although the City will create a list of finalists by considering factors such as the potential to improve broadband infrastructure in underserved areas, the ISP’s final determination will be based on the feasibility of wiring the finalist’s location. As a result, this will continue to prevent broadband internet accessibility in certain communities. | | | |
< < | Similarly, the City (through ConnectNYC? ) has only assured that a minimum of 25% of the overall award value will be granted to businesses located in Industrial Business Zones. This could potentially mean that only a small number of the award winners come from the most underserved areas, again failing to live up to it’s alleged purpose of decreasing the digital divide in the City. | > > | Similarly, the City (through ConnectNYC) has only assured that a minimum of 25% of the overall award value will be granted to businesses located in Industrial Business Zones. This could potentially mean that only a small number of the award winners come from the most underserved areas, again failing to live up to it’s alleged purpose of decreasing the digital divide in the City. | | Conclusion | |
< < | Ultimately, although ConnectNYC? provides wiring and reduces the number of “digital deserts” in the City, it still presents impediments to real access to networks. As such, it also fails to realize its maximum economic potential. The ultimate determination as to whether the digital divide is being addressed will come when the City reveals the award winners on March 1, 2013. | > > | Ultimately, although ConnectNYC provides wiring and reduces the number of “digital deserts” in the City, it still presents impediments to real access to networks. As such, it also fails to realize its maximum economic potential. The ultimate determination as to whether the digital divide is being addressed will come when the City reveals the award winners on March 1, 2013.
It seems to me that the
primary difficulty here lies in taking all of this at anywhere near
face value. What we have is a small subsidy ($12m over two years:
chicken feed on both sides) to the cable thugs to go out and make
some television commercials for themselves with squeaky clean young
businesses while getting around to a few buildings they haven't
bothered with, because they're just marginally not good enough to
bother about. But if the city will pay them $12m to get around to
them.....
This isn't bandwidth policy. This is a little tip that was thrown
around like small change when some other deals were being done. TW
Cable and Cablevision have more than that in back taxes they haven't
paid, I daresay. We can solemnly discuss whether it's good or bad
but the truth is it's just hype. The actual issues of how to
connect communities in are $100s millions wide in NYC, $10s billions wide
across the US, and they don't have to do with fiber-to-business.
They have to do with giving everybody, across the continent,
realistic broadband at affordable prices, which the US network
operators don't want to do. Nothing the size of this little program
has anything to do with that, and what your essay might want to be
about is the way in which little stuff on this scale looks busy, and
keeps Americans from demanding what other people in the world
already have.
| | |
|
ConradJohnsonSecondPaper 1 - 02 Dec 2012 - Main.ConradJohnson
|
|
> > |
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondPaper" |
ConnectNYC? : Mayor Bloomberg's Attempt at Solving the Digital Divide
-- By ConradJohnson - 02 Dec 2012
Introduction: ConnectNYC?
On October 19, 2012, New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg launched ConnectNYC? , a competition to install free fiber cable wiring in growing businesses across the City’s five boroughs. The purpose of this competition is to encourage small and medium-sized businesses in unwired or under-wired buildings to apply for free fast-track wiring that would ultimately provide or improve access to high-speed broadband internet. Companies would apply through a competitive process that will make awards based on a demonstration of how additional connectivity would help them grow their business. Ultimately, by the end of the second year of the program, the City expects Time Warner Cable and Cablevision (partners in the initiative) to commence free fiber build-out for 240 competition-winning businesses.
ConnectNYC? is part of a larger set of new initiatives planned by Mayor Bloomberg “designed to address specific challenge areas the City faces to ensure NYC is a global leader in connectivity and technology in the 21st century” (description of other iniatives. When taken as a whole, Mayor Bloomberg’s new initiatives appear to be designed to capitalize on the growth currently taking place within the City’s technology sector. The Mayor stated so himself, noting his intent on supporting the “growing technology industry” that “is diversifying the City’s economy and creating the jobs of the future.” “To support those jobs,” said the Mayor, “we need to help the industry get the resources it needs – whether that means more qualified engineers or broadband connections.” Thus, as part of his tireless pursuit to make NYC rival Silicon Valley as the center for technological work and innovation, Mayor Bloomberg recognizes the benefits of supporting technological growth in a variety of sectors. Yet, the Mayor insists that these initiatives, particularly ConnectNYC? , are truly geared toward decreasing the “digital divide” – the inequality between groups, broadly construed, in terms of access to information and communication technologies – in the City. The Mayor believes tt can achieve this because “it will make sure more businesses and more New Yorkers can get connected.” However, despite the Mayor’s assertions and any potential benefits of the program, ConnectNYC? fails to truly serve the underserved in pursuit of increased digital connectivity.
Benefits
It would be unfair to state that nothing positive could stem from an initiative like ConnectNYC? . In fact, that notion would be entirely incorrect. The mere fact that this initiative was created demonstrates a crucial awareness by Mayor Bloomberg and other politicians of the importance of accessible internet for the City’s population. As City Council Speaker Christine C. Quinn noted, this effort to “improve access to high-speed broadband come[s] at a time when our city’s businesses and residents depend on the internet more now than ever before.” What these politicians are realizing is that internet access, particularly broadband in NYC, is the infrastructure of the modern age and a basic necessity, not just for tech businesses, but for every business. Thus, ConnectNYC? could harness market dynamics and incentives for the private sector to expand New York’s broadband infrastructure.
Furthermore, in the digital economy, it is of great importance that our politicians recognize that removing impediments to internet access will allow the skilled minds produced in poorer places in the city to participate in higher-value activities without relocating, thus directly producing better lives for their community. ConnectNYC? could achieve this goal by removing the cost of fiber build-out for smaller businesses in underserved communities. The cost of a wiring build-out is often identified as one of the biggest hurdles to getting businesses connected to broadband internet, with the average cost being approximately $50,000 per business. However, although eliminating this cost could be very beneficial for some small businesses, one of the requirements for achieving the true benefits of a digital economy by reducing the “digital divide” is to provide unimpeded access to the network, regardless of ability to pay.
Failure's to Adress the Digital Divide
For ConnectNYC? , free isn’t free, and the ability to pay may still be a factor. Once selections have been made, businesses chosen to participate will be required to sign a one-year service contract with a participating Internet Service Provider (Time Warner Cable and Cablevision) at negotiated market rates prior to being eligible to receive the fiber build-out. This service contract would thus maintain impediments towards access to information and communication technologies that would continue to be felt by those in low-income communities.
A purported justification for this service fee is that the two year program will equal $12 million, with presumably most of the costs for the build-outs falling on the ISPs. Yet, one can only assume that the ISP’s efforts to expand the broadband infrastructure into other areas of the City were inevitable, given that it would make proper business sense to extend their services into new developing communities. ConnectNYC? simply ensures that the ISP’s consumer base grows. Furthermore, this argument fails to recognize that ConnectNYC? provides that the ISPs have final say on whom the awards are given to. Although the City will create a list of finalists by considering factors such as the potential to improve broadband infrastructure in underserved areas, the ISP’s final determination will be based on the feasibility of wiring the finalist’s location. As a result, this will continue to prevent broadband internet accessibility in certain communities.
Similarly, the City (through ConnectNYC? ) has only assured that a minimum of 25% of the overall award value will be granted to businesses located in Industrial Business Zones. This could potentially mean that only a small number of the award winners come from the most underserved areas, again failing to live up to it’s alleged purpose of decreasing the digital divide in the City.
Conclusion
Ultimately, although ConnectNYC? provides wiring and reduces the number of “digital deserts” in the City, it still presents impediments to real access to networks. As such, it also fails to realize its maximum economic potential. The ultimate determination as to whether the digital divide is being addressed will come when the City reveals the award winners on March 1, 2013.
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list. |
|
|