Law in the Internet Society

View   r15  >  r14  ...
GraspingTheNetTalk 15 - 30 Sep 2009 - Main.JonathanBoyer
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="GraspingtheNet"
I just read the article about "cooking-pot" markets, which happened to comment on my "altruism" critique (last paragraph), so I will go ahead and provide a block quote, followed by a response:
Line: 174 to 174
 

-- BrettJohnson - 30 Sep 2009

Added:
>
>

Gotcha - thanks. I've heard of the equal proportion approach, but I guess I assumed that it should apply per-post, which incited my observation of a sudden shift in writing style. It's interesting, though -- it reminds me of the equal protection debate: the colorblind constitution versus a more acknowledging, anti-subordination interpretation. If the colorblind perspective is at all applicable here, the equal proportion approach to pronouns is misguided; in fact, the very existence of male and female pronouns is flawed in that the duality is inevitably subordinating. Some might argue to have a single, unisex pronoun, but I cannot name anyone in particular. Again, I have not thought all this through, so I don't want to associate myself rigidly with any particular "position." I hope that is acceptable, for now.

-- JonathanBoyer - 30 Sep 2009

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

META TOPICMOVED by="EbenMoglen" date="1253993531" from="LawNetSoc.GraspingTheNetTale" to="LawNetSoc.GraspingTheNetTalk"

Revision 15r15 - 30 Sep 2009 - 22:38:19 - JonathanBoyer
Revision 14r14 - 30 Sep 2009 - 21:39:17 - BrettJohnson
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM