Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r3  >  r2  ...
MarvinGallowayFirstPaper 3 - 12 Mar 2021 - Main.MarvinGalloway
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"

It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

Line: 9 to 9
 

Section I (Section 230)

Changed:
<
<
>
>		Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has been under much scrutiny from various political actors for quite a while. With the culmination of the 2020 Presidential election, it once again has been at the forefront of discussions addressing the perceived need for more intensive internet regulation. While the debates regarding its status and applicability remain rather inconclusive, many seem to be built on misunderstandings and flawed perceptions of Section 230’s purpose and effect.
 

Subsection A (Background)

Changed:
<
<
>
>		When Section 230 was passed as an amendment to the Telecommunications Act in 1996, with overwhelming bipartisan support, it was viewed as a tool to incentivize self-regulation by companies such as CompuServe? and America Online with regards to user-generated third party content.
 

Subsub 1 (Legislative History)


Revision 3r3 - 12 Mar 2021 - 16:30:41 - MarvinGalloway
Revision 2r2 - 11 Mar 2021 - 16:38:50 - MarvinGalloway
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM