English Legal History and its Materials

View   r2  >  r1  ...
MitchellAllestry 2 - 06 Nov 2008 - Main.MatthewPodolsky
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="PaperTopics"

Mitchell v. Allestry

This case, materials collected at B & M 572, was seen in the 18th and 19th centuries as inventing what American lawyers took Lemuel Shaw to have invented in Brown v. Kendall. Please explain how they can both be right or how both were wrong, and what the pleadings in Mitchell show the case should be remembered for.

Added:
>
>

I'll take this topic.

-- MatthewPodolsky - 06 Nov 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

MitchellAllestry 1 - 06 Nov 2008 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="PaperTopics"

Mitchell v. Allestry

This case, materials collected at B & M 572, was seen in the 18th and 19th centuries as inventing what American lawyers took Lemuel Shaw to have invented in Brown v. Kendall. Please explain how they can both be right or how both were wrong, and what the pleadings in Mitchell show the case should be remembered for.

 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 2r2 - 06 Nov 2008 - 16:58:25 - MatthewPodolsky
Revision 1r1 - 06 Nov 2008 - 16:38:02 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM