| | |
|
FernandoGarciaSecondEssay 3 - 30 May 2024 - Main.FernandoGarcia
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
| | | While no two people will ever agree on everything that constitutes evil, certain things can generally be considered to fall into that category. Murder, assault, and sex crimes, for example, are typically regarded as objectively evil—as is, for that matter, much of criminal law. This superficial (for the purpose of this essay) interpretation of evil, while not necessarily incorrect, virtually always involves lawyers by default. An almost indeterminable number of lawyers are in the business of representing alleged wrongdoers, notwithstanding their aptitude for evil. But I am not interested in such interpretations of evil that focus on how a lawyer perceives her clients. Truth be told, I don’t care what a lawyer thinks of their clients—I am interested in what a lawyer thinks of the systems and institutions within which they practice; the expertise, tools, and knowledge they rely on to navigate those systems on behalf of their clients; and how working in those systems gave them the knowledge to build an effective practice. | |
<
< | Lawyers are practically never called upon unless there is conflict. | >
> | Lawyers are typically called upon to resolve, avoid, and sometimes how to properly engage in, conflict. When we get the call, it means something went wrong—or is about to go wrong—and somebody is in dire need of our expertise. The general conception of the relationship between lawyering and evil is as follows: A wrongs B. B retains a lawyer to right A’s wrong—to make things right against the evil A caused. Although this general interpretation of a lawyers’ work is not necessarily incorrect, it assumes that lawyers only fight isolated evils perpetrated by individuals. Although lawyers are surrounded by the evil outcomes their clients perpetrate, the “evil[s]” which lawyers are never far from are more pervasive and difficult to single out. Most lawyers do not fight evil—they navigate through and around, and sometimes even weaponize, evil within the systems in which they practice. The “evil” we are never far from is found in these systems. Although lawyers do not typically suffer directly at the hands of the evils of a particular system, we advocate for those that do. Thus, we can never be far from evil if we wish to practice law. | | | | |
<
< |
Not necessarily. Lawyers whose practice is counseling produce their value to clients by enablement, not necessarily by gaining in, or even by avoiding, conflict.
When we get the call, it means something went wrong and somebody is in dire need of our expertise. The general conception of the relationship between lawyering and evil is as follows: A wrongs B. B retains a lawyer to right A’s wrong—to make things right against the evil A caused. This general interpretation of a lawyers’ work assumes that lawyers fight isolated evils perpetrated by individuals. However, these are not the “evil[s]” lawyers are never far from. Most lawyers do not fight evil—they navigate through and around, and sometimes even weaponize, evil within the systems in which they practice. The “evil” we are never far from is found in the systems within which we practice. Although lawyers do not directly suffer at the hands of the evils of a particular system, we advocate for those that do. Thus, we can never be far from evil if we wish to practice law.
Perhaps this is what Kafka meant. But it is also possible that lawyers are close to the simple additive horror that Avi Shalit saw On Gaza Beach: that many not-evil people can together (in families and partnerships, as well as in "systems" and "institutions," outcomes that are evil indeed.
| | |
Running Towards Evil | | | I see my job as a lawyer as one that calls me to engage with such systems that spread violence and injustice to help those who need my expertise navigating, managing, and evading evil. Learning how to effectively do so is my reason for returning to Columbia next term. I wholeheartedly agreed with Eben when he stated his belief that the world would be more just if we become lawyers. Is it too broad to say that I want to be a lawyer to make the world more just? Perhaps. But it is certainly a good reason to return to law school in the fall, even if dedicating my studies to such a pursuit will lead to a lifetime near evil. | |
<
< |
It seems like an equitable proposition to me that if I will do my job, you will do yours. This is what teaching should be about, in my view. You have indeed begun to decide what your job will be, and I have every confidence in your ability and resolve to do it.
| >
> | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| | |