CRT did not solely emerge from a philosophical critique of prevailing paradigms of racial power; it originated from activists’ engagement with the practical outcomes of liberal reform. CRT examines the law through critical lens motivated by an oppositional stance toward racial power and equity. The goal was to have institutions reexamine and revise their notions of race neutrality. From my experience, law schools should reconsider and adjust their concepts of race neutrality. This approach would create space and context for marginalized groups to voice their perspectives and address sensitive topics that are often avoided.