| |
AsherKalman 8 - 21 Feb 2020 - Main.AsherKalman
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="TWikiUsers" |
| | Thesis: we need to be able to fit ideals to serve practical needs | |
> > | Swindling and Selling
Chapter 1 - What and Why
Sonnenlieb, lawyer/salesman came up with the idea of referral sales, ended up broke
This is one example of pyramid selling, America’s top swindle
Many forms of selling and conning have been going on forever
Underneath all of them is a fundamental invariant, and it’s important to draw distinctions between swindles and sales
Chapter 2 - The General Principles of Swindling and Selling
We buy with implicit cost/ben analysis--you’ll be richer
Which implies the seller is fine losing or some third party is fine losing so the buyer can win
There’s also an implicit explanation for why the customer/mark is chosen
No conman offers something for nothing; at least they pretend there’s a trade
Conmen often see everyone as rational economic actors
So, knowing wealth cannot be created from thin air, they try to get the mark to feel as though they’re contributing heavily to the trade
Two types
One, where personal value creates value from a trade
When outsiders exist, they can be competitors as well as victims, so you must convince the buyer/mark as being needed more than others
Chapter 3 - Two-Party Playlets
The Spanish prisoner: a clear showing of something that is in every sale and swindle
A person privy of wealth but in jail
Without both together, nothing of value exists
The prisoner must show he could get the letter to someone else, but it would be quite difficult
This is a microeconomic bilateral monopoly problem
A play gets constructed
The “Psst buddy”
Someone pretends to have stolen goods and sells them cheaply relative to what they would have cost
Here, the mark is altercast as a member of a small demand group, as opposed to a monopsonist in the Spanish prisoner
Things get more interesting and effective with more people, when the boodle can be made onstage
Chapter 4 - Three-Party Plays
The big con
Rigged horse betting, getting him some money, then getting him to give more and stealing it
All starting by finding a guy’s wallet and him winning money for them as a “thank you”
One of the most powerful roles to give the customer/mark is to see through someone else’s role, thereby hiding the fact that that he’s still in the audience
There are also short cons, rigged games of chance, but quicker, and the person to be robbed is actually onstage
Chapter 6 - Bargains: Face-to-Facework
So far all cons can be understood as both parties thinking they get a bargain
The Squaresville pitch--it saying you’ll sell cheaply and also worth selling to the buyer; it’s interesting bc in a perfect market it shouldn’t exist
Have to avoid it seeming that the price difference is due to the product being different; instead, you have to demonstrate being the beneficiary of market failure
Often also, lower prices mean more units sold, mean economies of scale
Stable cost advantage and fleeting deflection have the same logical form--I have a reason why I can and must give you a bargain
Creating buyer inertia with clear discounts, physical proximity, etc. can make buyers more likely to purchase
Salesmen have an edge on sellers, for example, in driving customer inertia forward
Salesmen also can get edges by giving information that affects the seller but not the salesman in this case
They also cut along class and racial lines to cut across seller-buyer distinction | |
For privacy reasons, some fields in this form are not visible when viewing the page.
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| |